Most technology companies are driven only by its developments on the field of technology. In a marketing perspective, an excessive focus on technology can lead to:
- Clear amount of irrelevant products
- Exceptional products not well marketed
- Or products which don’t make the cut – missing customer understanding (related with previous)
Take China. There are numerous technology companies here. Quite adventurous, they frequently put all sorts of existing technology in one single product, hoping will create an exceptional product because nobody remembered it before. In fact, without knowing the true reason for their existence, sales lead to a dead end.
They also combine new ways to re-invent a product, or excessively develop products which enables us to do something we already do with other products, result - we don’t really need it. Without starting from ‘outside-in’, they end up again asking themselves why it didn’t worked out.
Same happens with big companies. Microsoft developed Windows Vista. From my experience and people around, several are considering using XP again. Its true that those continuous updates can save my computer of having a hard time with a Virus; the software upgrades can help me in the future having a better enhancement on whatever program is; or the 10 minutes I wasted waiting for the system to reboot again are worth something.
But in fact, my current priorities are definitely not having a computer which turns out to be slower, fails to deliver performance at crucial levels, and insistingly closes my applications (sometimes suddenly). On my value figure, one of the most important engagement rules I expect is speed and functionality. If I have to lower down my Windows version because my newer version is in fact more slower, then this is a huge marketing mistake of Microsoft and a brand killer.




